Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) iPhone followers got breitling replica two conflicting pieces of data regarding its $499 price point. In one survey done by an online shopping firm Compete as louis vuitton replica reported by MacWorld UK, only one percent of the consumers who said they were likely to buy an iPhone said swiss replica watches they would pay $500 for it. Sounds bad right? Stay tuned -- there's a gotcha in that survey that I'll address in a minute.On omega replica the other side of the pricing gap, though, was an article in Friday's Boston Globe that insists that increasingly, cell phone buyers are insisting on style over hublot replica circuitry. That report features a lovely portfolio of cell phones that are currently hot rolex replica fashions, including the Prada/LG black touch-screen phone and the Dolce Gabbana gold RAZR. Not one of the phones featured with a price had a price less than $700, making the $500 Apple iPhone look like the cartier replica bargain of the bunch. So which view should we believe?My view is that Apple is marketing the iPhone, not as a phone for "the rest of us", but as a mass-market luxury item. Designer products such as those noted in the Globe article have high prices for louis vuitton replica one essential reason: they create exclusivity and thereby, desirability. Apple has chosen a relatively high price for the iPhone omega replica for the same reason: to position it as an aspirational purchase, similar to a Fendi handbag or replica watches Jimmy Choo shoes. And by introducing it at $500, iPhones will remain rare enough that they will garner replica watches uk the same types of attention, at least for the first year or two.